Did anybody notice that...

[Jack55]

...the resolution of the last six videos has been raised from 800x450 to 900x508?
Thank you very much for this improvement Sandra! :icon_hug:

BTW I confess that I'm not a real fan of the mov format and I would really like to have your videos also in an alternative format (avi or wmv) and in 720p HD format, just because they better show your beauty. :boobies:

I know that this issue has already been raised many times, but I think it would be really great.
What do you Sandra and guys think about it?

Have a great time in Portugal!

Jack

[john2004]

...the resolution of the last six videos has been raised from 800x450 to 900x508?
Thank you very much for this improvement Sandra! :icon_hug:

BTW I confess that I'm not a real fan of the mov format and I would really like to have your videos also in an alternative format (avi or wmv) and in 720p HD format, just because they better show your beauty. :boobies:

I know that this issue has already been raised many times, but I think it would be really great.
What do you Sandra and guys think about it?

Have a great time in Portugal!

Jack


I hadn't really noticed that.
It wasn't really something that I was looking for.

I was going to mention something about the new Sandra and
Becky video...but I wasn't really sure about it all so I decided
not to.
...but now that this related topic has come up...I might as
well mention it...even if I am wrong about it.

Was there possibly something a bit "off" with the new Sandra and
Becky video?...related to the video image quality.
I wasn't sure if it was just me..and my eyes..or if there really
was something just a bit "off"...especially at the very start
of the video.
Maybe it was just the focus and the distances involved
at the start of that scene..maybe combined with the
colors and the setting etc.
It wasn't a really big deal...but it was something enough to catch
my eye and to make me start to wonder about it.


This is really no big deal.....I was just wondering if anyone else might've
run into any similar or related thoughts.

[Jack55]

I hadn't really noticed that.
It wasn't really something that I was looking for.

I was going to mention something about the new Sandra and
Becky video...but I wasn't really sure about it all so I decided
not to.
...but now that this related topic has come up...I might as
well mention it...even if I am wrong about it.

Was there possibly something a bit "off" with the new Sandra and
Becky video?...related to the video image quality.
I wasn't sure if it was just me..and my eyes..or if there really
was something just a bit "off"...especially at the very start
of the video.
Maybe it was just the focus and the distances involved
at the start of that scene..maybe combined with the
colors and the setting etc.
It wasn't a really big deal...but it was something enough to catch
my eye and to make me start to wonder about it.


This is really no big deal.....I was just wondering if anyone else might've
run into any similar or related thoughts.

Hi John,
thank you answering my question: you've been the only one, so I guess it probably means I'm the only one interested in seeing Sandra in the best quality. :bee:
Hope to read the opinion of someone else too!
My only concern is that the quality of Sandra's video reflects her flawless beauty.:hearts:

About the last video I didn't notice anything different from the oldest videos, but looking again the I saw some "trail" on sharp movements at the beginning.

For sure the combination between the live colors of the couch and the light coming from the big side window may cause some problem in contrast and sharpness, but nothing to really complain about: the content of the video was out of discussion.

I checked out the technical data and saw that this video has a frame rate of 25 frame/second.
The previous one, "on the table", which also looked me with some little problem in sharpness, had a frame rate of 30 frame/second, but anyway it was shot after Becky's one, according to her diary.

Jack

[Razor]

Hi John,
thank you answering my question: you've been the only one, so I guess it probably means I'm the only one interested in seeing Sandra in the best quality. :bee:
Hope to read the opinion of someone else too!
My only concern is that the quality of Sandra's video reflects her flawless beauty.:hearts:
We noticed, I've been purposely avoiding this thread, the last discussion video resolutions and formats got a little heated and I really don't think we need to open this can of worms to again... :)

Personally, I think things are fine the way they are, Sandra's videos hold up pretty well when played back though our Apple TV on a 55" 1080p TV.

[Jack55]

We noticed, I've been purposely avoiding this thread, the last discussion video resolutions and formats got a little heated and I really don't think we need to open this can of worms to again... :)


Oh really? I didn't know, I apologize.
My very last intention was to bother Sandra or other users.
If it is so, do let's close this issue. :work:



Personally, I think things are fine the way they are, Sandra's videos hold up pretty well when played back though our Apple TV on a 55" 1080p TV.


You, lucky bastard... :lol::thumbsup:

Thanks for the polite advice
Jack

[Razor]

Oh really? I didn't know, I apologize.
My very last intention was to bother Sandra or other users.
If it is so, do let's close this issue. :work:



You, lucky bastard... :lol::thumbsup:

Thanks for the polite advice
Jack
LOL, No worries mate it was a long time ago, I doubt anyone outside a few oldtimers even remember it. :)